Media/Medical and Science Ethics

The rapid advancement in engineering made human so maintenancesome close the dangers it brings themmost oddly of the danger that leave ca procedure their extinction. It is not mere computer or cellular phone that advances. Today, genetics, nano engine room, and robotics (GNR) slay that constant fear to knock on the feet of human track to a greater extent frequent than ever.Dr. Ralph Merkle, in his female genitalsvas entitled Nanotechnology Its a elfin, Sm each, Small, Small World (2000), pleasantly drew a future that is happily gains from the various benefits of nanotechnology in almost all areas from which animation- cadence greatly directs. He verbalize that nanotechnology is being pushed with towards an objective. That is to sacrifice almost both fabricate product faster, lighter, stronger, smarter, safer, and cleaner. He even enumerated benefits that nanotechnology whitethorn provide humanity especially on transportation, atom computers, military applications, solar energy, and medical drills.Dr. Merkle has laid down very honest arguments. He concord surely make good impressions to whoever reads his essay. Dr. Merkle, who became scientific in describing when and in what manner humans exit use nanotechnology, is indeed an ethical engineer and inventor. He became solely after to whatever nanotechnology can give humans to improve their mundane living. nevertheless all the benefits he said in his essay are to a fault the weaknesses of his arguments and he was not able to build more sentences to defend them. Though Dr. Merkle mazed to include in his essay the dangers at par with the benefits of nanotechnology, Dr. Bill rejoicing provided them is his essay.Dr. joyousness, in his essay The Future Doesnt assume Us (2000), materialized and typesetd that fear. In position with the fast-paced technological advancement, he everyplaceshadowed a future dominated either by elites that uses GNR as a machinery to eliminate the mint or by ego istic individuals who spirt hard to aim vested interests or by the robots themselves with the powerful wit as lots as that of a human being. Dr. rejoicing constructed such plausible reality in a logical structure, discussing how and what did technological advancements hunt in human community for the otherwise(prenominal) centuries. Indeed, he showed how dangers go in correspond with the advantages and benefits of technology.He, however, like any other individual, has all the reason to be fearsome about the technological advancements vis--vis GNR. History tells the world how did the collection of atoms forming a huge atomic barrage become so destructiveremoves geographical and topographical places and killed thousands of mess in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This is undecomposed one of the grave mass deaths and destructions that shake the whole world until now. History alike tells us how technological advancements on medicines permitted the resurrect of new medicines aimed to secure individuals from the former medicines. It is, Dr. Joy forelands out, in the hands of the wrong people that such potential dangers are permitted to egest and may do mishandling, abuse, and accidents to recur over and over again.Each of the two essays could be said as complement to the other however, this accompaniment discloses another significant retail store Which of the two needs more importance, the duties or payoffs of technology?The abovementioned question now asks get on question, who among the two makes a collapse point? Dr. Merkle is pushing through the duties technology provides humansthe duty of improving everyday life through manufactured products that were equipped with more efficiency, while Dr. Joy stresses on the consequences that make technology endanger lifethe pros and the cons of technology and how it contributes to humans extinction in the near future. For instance, the medical application of nanotechnology will lead to a better medical treatment of illness, Dr. Merkle said.The assurance, however, that it will lead to a better, and perhaps safer, treatment is blurry. The creation of anti-antibiotics will testify to such inadequacy. Another usage would be the military uses of nanotechnology to create better and more effective weapons. A state which has strong weapons to use during wars will, of course, able to engage the victory. Nanotechnology will be of great cooperate in creating such weapons. However, if the opportunity to use nanotechnology to arrange atoms in a style creating weaponswere given and used for mass destructions by, to what Dr. Joy pertains, bad people, we will witness on this part the disadvantage.Whether the phenomenon is an unseen/unpredicted position or a willfully-done event, the raison dtre remains to every duty of technology there is a parallel consequence. Too bad that when the consequence is bad and/or destructive, it cost us million lives and million-worth assets to vanished in split seconds, or it costs our daily living to be gradually ruined everyday.Whether duty or consequence deserves more regard, some would dormant think if we are to coexist with technology harmoniously or end up victims of it, like Dr. Joy thought of. precisely still, like what Dr. Merkle tells us, a lot would depend on when we start.As technology and experience rapidly changes, man has become wiser than ever. But the question to both Dr. Merkle and Dr. Joy excessively bothers even ordinary individuals, where are we headed as human race given that we are placed in now super technological world?Dr. Joy tells that more things greatly depends on humansthat is if we will still be driven by societal transformation, progress, and well-being. If not, progress will be somewhat bittersweet.True enough, humans coexists in a one world. To clearly define the duties technology should and at the same time eliminating, or the least expense, minimizing, the dangers it may give us, molecular manufacturing (as p art of the nanotechnology) requires the coordinated efforts of many another(prenominal) people in many years, as what Dr. Merkle said.At the end of the day, the challenge to us is more likely to be as particular as how to protect life improving it is perhaps a high task that awaits us.